Published tribunal order
Tenancy Tribunal case 4574131 — Property damage at 25B Russley Drive, Mount Maunganui, Mount Maunganui
Decided 5 Sept 2023 · Published 5 Sept 2023 · Application 4574131
Landlord favoured
- Property damage
Order
- No application for suppression has been made in this case and no suppression orders apply around publication of this decision.
- Kylie Hayman must pay Boutique Rentals Bop Limited $1,802.35 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.
Reasons
- The landlord attended the hearing. The tenant did not appear.
- The landlord has applied for compensation and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.
- The landlord confirmed they are holding a balance of $168.09 from the bond.
Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?
- A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.
- Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.
- Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.
- Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.
- Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. See Guo v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.
- The following damage was caused during the tenancy: red staining on carpets in all 3 bedrooms, brown stains on carpet in the lounge/dining area, and black marks throughout the garage ceiling. The carpet stains and ceiling stains could not be removed by cleaning. The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.
- The landlord has provided documentation to show that 2 insurance excesses have been applied to the claim for replacement carpet by the insurance company. The landlord claimed $989.00 for painting the garage ceiling but the insurance excess of $650.00 applies. The amounts ordered are proved.
- I have taken into account betterment and depreciation.
- Because Boutique Rentals Bop Limited has wholly succeeded with the claim, the tenant must reimburse the filing fee.