What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 4719453?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Martin Anderson at Unit/Flat 4H, 11A Central Avenue,

How much money was awarded in case 4719453?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4719453?

The primary dispute was Harassment.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4719453?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/9865731-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 4719453?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Martin Anderson at Unit/Flat 4H, 11A Central Avenue,

How much money was awarded in case 4719453?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4719453?

The primary dispute was Harassment.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4719453?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/9865731-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

Unit/Flat 4H, 11A Central Avenue, Papatoetoe, Auckland Tenancy Tribunal Case 4719453 — Harassment

Tenantcheck Insights

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Reasons

Only the landlord attended the hearing.

The landlord has applied to the Tribunal for an order terminating the periodic tenancy on the grounds of anti-social behaviour from the tenant.

Subject to certain considerations, the Tribunal must make an order terminating the tenancy if it is satisfied: a. on 3 separate occasions within a 90-day period the tenant, or a person in the premises with the tenant’s permission, engaged in anti-social behaviour in connection with the tenancy; and b. on each occasion the landlord gave the tenant written notice— i. describing clearly which specific behaviour was considered to be anti-social and (if known to the landlord) who engaged in it; and ii. advising the tenant of the date, approximate time, and location of the behaviour; and iii. stating how many other notices (if any) the landlord has given the tenant under this paragraph in connection with the same tenancy and the same 90-day period; and iv. advising the tenant of the tenant’s right to make an application to the Tribunal challenging the notice and; c. the landlord’s application to the Tribunal was made within 28 days after the landlord gave the third notice.

The Act confirms that antisocial behaviour includes harassment or any act (whether intentional or not) that reasonably causes alarm, distress or nuisance that is more than minor.

I have taken into account the evidence presented by the landlord of the following anti-social behaviour of the tenant: a. On 8/9 October 2023, the tenant played loud noise/music all night until 6 in the morning. b. On 14 October 2023, the tenant filmed a female neighbour without her permission while the female neighbour was talking to her neighbour. The filming of the neighbour in the manner complained by the neighbour is both intimidating and unsettling. c. On 18 October 2023, the tenant wilfully damaged Wifi equipment provided by the landlord which wire to the infrastructure is situated on common areas of the complex.

I have determined that the landlord has established that anti-social behaviour has occurred on the premises by the tenant. The landlord has served notices on the tenant as required in the Residential Tenancies Act 1986, and the application to the Tribunal was made within 28 days of the date of the third notice.

I consider it would not be unfair to terminate the tenancy taking into account the circumstances in which the behaviour arose and the notices were given. I cannot see that the landlord has acted in any retaliatory way in bringing this application.

I cannot consider the impact on the tenant, in making an order for termination of the tenancy.

Reasons

Only the landlord attended the hearing.

The landlord has applied to the Tribunal for an order terminating the periodic tenancy on the grounds of anti-social behaviour from the tenant.

The Act confirms that antisocial behaviour includes harassment or any act (whether intentional or not) that reasonably causes alarm, distress or nuisance that is more than minor.

I cannot consider the impact on the tenant, in making an order for termination of the tenancy.

Tenancy Tribunal case 4719453 — Harassment at Unit/Flat 4H, 11A Central Avenue, Papatoetoe, Auckland

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 4719453 — Harassment at Unit/Flat 4H, 11A Central Avenue, Papatoetoe, Auckland

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions