What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 4994929?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Drucilla Salesa at 184 Earn Street, Appleby, Invercargill 9812 is

How much money was awarded in case 4994929?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4994929?

The primary dispute was Harassment.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4994929?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10908816-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 4994929?

The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Drucilla Salesa at 184 Earn Street, Appleby, Invercargill 9812 is

How much money was awarded in case 4994929?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 4994929?

The primary dispute was Harassment.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 4994929?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/10908816-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

184 Earn Street, Appleby, Invercargill 9812 Tenancy Tribunal Case 4994929 — Harassment

Tenantcheck Insights

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing. The tenant had two support people present.

The landlord has applied to the Tribunal for an order terminating the periodic tenancy on the grounds of anti-social behaviour from the tenant or someone on the premises with the tenant’s permission.

The landlord states that the anti-social behaviour involves loud parties and the after math of those including vomit in a shared stair well, bottles littering the property and cigarette butts.

Subject to certain considerations, the Tribunal must make an order terminating the tenancy if it is satisfied: a. on 3 separate occasions within a 90-day period the tenant, or a person in the premises with the tenant’s permission, engaged in anti-social behaviour in connection with the tenancy; and b. on each occasion the landlord gave the tenant written notice— i. describing clearly which specific behaviour was considered to be anti-social and (if known to the landlord) who engaged in it; and ii. advising the tenant of the date, approximate time, and location of the behaviour; and iii. stating how many other notices (if any) the landlord has given the tenant under this paragraph in connection with the same tenancy and the same 90-day period; and iv. advising the tenant of the tenant’s right to make an application to the Tribunal challenging the notice and; c. the landlord’s application to the Tribunal was made within 28 days after the landlord gave the third notice.

The Act confirms that antisocial behaviour includes harassment or any act (whether intentional or not) that reasonably causes alarm, distress or nuisance that is more than minor.

The tenant accepted the incidents and understood that I was required to terminate the tenancy.

I have taken into account the evidence presented by the parties as set out above.

I have determined that the landlord has established that anti-social behaviour has occurred on the premises by the tenant or a person on the tenancy with the tenant’s permission. The landlord has served notices on the tenant as required in the Residential Tenancies Act 1986, and the application to the Tribunal was made within 28 days of the date of the third notice.

I cannot consider the impact on the tenant, in making an order for termination of the tenancy.

The landlord has agreed to allow the tenant time to vacate the property and therefore based on the consent of the parties the tenancy will terminate on Thursday 24 th October 2024 at 5pm. There is bno application to release the bond at this time given the final inspection is to take place.

Reasons

Both parties attended the hearing. The tenant had two support people present.

The landlord states that the anti-social behaviour involves loud parties and the after math of those including vomit in a shared stair well, bottles littering the property and cigarette butts.

The Act confirms that antisocial behaviour includes harassment or any act (whether intentional or not) that reasonably causes alarm, distress or nuisance that is more than minor.

The tenant accepted the incidents and understood that I was required to terminate the tenancy.

I have taken into account the evidence presented by the parties as set out above.

I cannot consider the impact on the tenant, in making an order for termination of the tenancy.

Tenancy Tribunal case 4994929 — Harassment at 184 Earn Street, Appleby, Invercargill 9812

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 4994929 — Harassment at 184 Earn Street, Appleby, Invercargill 9812

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Key findings

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Key findings

Frequently asked questions