What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5057588?

The tribunal order states: The tenant Terehina Elizabeth Nathan must remove all dogs from the premises

How much money was awarded in case 5057588?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5057588?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5057588?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11072371-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5057588?

The tribunal order states: The tenant Terehina Elizabeth Nathan must remove all dogs from the premises

How much money was awarded in case 5057588?

Verified claim lines are listed on this page.

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5057588?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5057588?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11072371-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

1A Rosemary Lane, Manurewa, Manukau 2102 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5057588 — Tenancy dispute

Tenantcheck Insights

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Reasons

Only the landlord, a social housing provider, attended the hearing.

I am satisfied from the evidence presented by the landlord that the tenant is in breach of her obligations when she kept dogs are the premises without permission of the landlord. The dogs were kept indoors and the dogs have soiled and damaged the premises. It was in order for the landlord not to permit the tenant to keep a dog or dogs at the property.

The landlord wants the problem fixed.

Under section 40(1)(a)-(e), Residential Tenancies Act 1986, a tenant has specific obligations in relation to the tenancy premises.

Where the Tribunal finds the tenant has failed to comply with any of these obligations, where appropriate it may make an order for the tenant to carry out the work. See section 78(1)(e) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

In this case, the work order involves the tenant removing all dogs from the premises. Section 77(2) RTA specifically provides the Tribunal shall have jurisdiction: (l) to order the landlord or the tenant under any tenancy agreement to which this Act applies to do anything necessary to remedy the breach by that party of any express or implied provision of the tenancy agreement or any provision of this Act, or to do anything that that party is required to do by any such provision: (m) to order the landlord or the tenant under any tenancy agreement to which this Act applies to refrain from doing anything if the doing of that thing by that party would constitute a contravention or (as the case may require) a further contravention of any express or implied provision of the tenancy agreement or any provision of this Act

At this juncture, only a work order for the tenant to remove dogs from the property is being sought by the social housing agency. The landlord reserves its right to apply for termination of the tenancy should this work order not be complied with.

Reasons

Only the landlord, a social housing provider, attended the hearing.

The landlord wants the problem fixed.

Under section 40(1)(a)-(e), Residential Tenancies Act 1986, a tenant has specific obligations in relation to the tenancy premises.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5057588 — Tenancy dispute at 1A Rosemary Lane, Manurewa, Manukau 2102

At a glance

Claims & awards

Tenancy Tribunal case 5057588 — Tenancy dispute at 1A Rosemary Lane, Manurewa, Manukau 2102

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions