Tenantcheck Insights · Case study
Tenancy Tribunal case 5392253 — Exemplary damages at 93 Queens Road, Panmure, Auckland 1072
Published 20 April 2026 · Application 5392253
- Exemplary damages
- Compensation
At a glance
Key facts from the published tribunal order.
Outcome
Tenant favoured
From published order
Location
Auckland
Tribunal region
Adjudicator
C Lamdin
Claims & awards
What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.
No individual claim amounts were reconciled for this order. View the official Ministry of Justice PDF for full detail.
Order
- The application is dismissed.
Reasons
- The landlord attended the hearing.
- The tenant did not attend at the scheduled time of 9.30 am as set out on the Notice of Hearing. The application was called at 9.45 am and 10.00 am. As the tenant was not present, had not requested an adjournment, or notified the Tribunal the matter has settled, the application was dismissed. See sections 78(1)(i) and 92(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Topics & place
Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).
Residential Tenancies Act sections
s78(1)
Key findings
- Dispute theme: exemplary damages
- Dispute theme: compensation
- Dispute theme: filing fee
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.
What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5392253?
The tribunal order states: The application is dismissed.
How much money was awarded in case 5392253?
Verified claim lines are listed on this page.
What type of tenancy dispute was case 5392253?
The primary dispute was Exemplary damages. Related themes: Compensation.
Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5392253?
The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13468839-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.