What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5462149?

The tribunal order states: The tenant must carry out the following work to the premises, which must be

How much money was awarded in case 5462149?

Th Either Order 1 Above, Then The La…: $2,000.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5462149?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5462149?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13531581-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5462149?

The tribunal order states: The tenant must carry out the following work to the premises, which must be

How much money was awarded in case 5462149?

Th Either Order 1 Above, Then The La…: $2,000.00 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5462149?

The dispute type was not classified.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5462149?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13531581-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.

Unit/Flat Apartment G03, 3 Tasman Avenue, Mount Albert, Tenancy Tribunal Case 5462149 — Tenancy dispute

Tenantcheck Insights

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Unit/Flat Apartment G03, 3 Tasman Avenue, Mount Albert, Tenancy Tribunal Case 5462149 — Tenancy dispute | TenantCheck

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5462149. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Tenant	Reason
th either Order 1 above, then the landlord may undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of this work up to	$2,000.00		th either Order 1 above, then the landlord may undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of this work up to

Claims and awards for application 5462149. Verify on MoJ.

th either Order 1 above, then the landlord may undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of this work up to

Amount: $2,000.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: th either Order 1 above, then the landlord may undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of this work up to

Order

The tenant must carry out the following work to the premises, which must be completed by 5pm Friday 22 May 2026. a. Removal of all excessive inorganic goods located inside the property front yard situated at G03, 3 Tasman Avenue, Mount Albert, Auckland to the satisfaction of the landlord.
If the tenant fails to comply with either Order 1 above, then the landlord may undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of this work up to $2,000.00. These costs may be treated as rent in arrears and enforced accordingly.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing. There was not attendance by the tenant.
The landlord claims that the tenant has accumulated a significant amount of excessive inorganic goods at the front of her property. The tenant is in breach of her obligation to keep the premises reasonably clean and tidy. The landlord issued the tenant with a notice to remedy on 9 December 2025. The tenant has failed to remedy the breach.
Under section 40(1)(a)-(e), Residential Tenancies Act 1986, a tenant has specific obligations in relation to the tenancy premises.
Where the Tribunal finds the tenant has failed to comply with any of these obligations, where appropriate it may make an order for the landlord to carry out the work. See section 78(1)(e) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
A work order may also authorise the landlord to undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of doing the work, if the tenant should fail to comply with the work order and alternative monetary order. A monetary limit must be imposed by the Tribunal on the amount of costs that can be charged. These costs can be treated as rent in arrears and enforced accordingly. See sections 78(2AAB) and 78(2AAC)(a) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Based on the photographic evidence filed in support by the landlord I am satisfied that the tenant has breached her obligations in this regard.
The landlord’s request for a work order is allowed.
The landlord is not seeking reimbursement of the filing fee.

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5462149. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Tenant	Reason
th either Order 1 above, then the landlord may undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of this work up to	$2,000.00		th either Order 1 above, then the landlord may undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of this work up to

Claims and awards for application 5462149. Verify on MoJ.

th either Order 1 above, then the landlord may undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of this work up to

Amount: $2,000.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: th either Order 1 above, then the landlord may undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of this work up to

Order

The tenant must carry out the following work to the premises, which must be completed by 5pm Friday 22 May 2026. a. Removal of all excessive inorganic goods located inside the property front yard situated at G03, 3 Tasman Avenue, Mount Albert, Auckland to the satisfaction of the landlord.
If the tenant fails to comply with either Order 1 above, then the landlord may undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of this work up to $2,000.00. These costs may be treated as rent in arrears and enforced accordingly.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing. There was not attendance by the tenant.
The landlord claims that the tenant has accumulated a significant amount of excessive inorganic goods at the front of her property. The tenant is in breach of her obligation to keep the premises reasonably clean and tidy. The landlord issued the tenant with a notice to remedy on 9 December 2025. The tenant has failed to remedy the breach.
Under section 40(1)(a)-(e), Residential Tenancies Act 1986, a tenant has specific obligations in relation to the tenancy premises.
Where the Tribunal finds the tenant has failed to comply with any of these obligations, where appropriate it may make an order for the landlord to carry out the work. See section 78(1)(e) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
A work order may also authorise the landlord to undertake the work and charge the tenant the costs of doing the work, if the tenant should fail to comply with the work order and alternative monetary order. A monetary limit must be imposed by the Tribunal on the amount of costs that can be charged. These costs can be treated as rent in arrears and enforced accordingly. See sections 78(2AAB) and 78(2AAC)(a) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Based on the photographic evidence filed in support by the landlord I am satisfied that the tenant has breached her obligations in this regard.
The landlord’s request for a work order is allowed.
The landlord is not seeking reimbursement of the filing fee.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5462149 — Tenancy dispute at Unit/Flat Apartment G03, 3 Tasman Avenue, Mount Albert,

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5462149 — Tenancy dispute at Unit/Flat Apartment G03, 3 Tasman Avenue, Mount Albert,

At a glance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Frequently asked questions