Loading insights…
Pulling tribunal records
Tenantcheck Insights
Loading insights…
Pulling tribunal records
Tenantcheck Insights · Case study
Decided 14 December 2025 · Published 14 December 2025 · Application 9055764
Key facts from the published tribunal order.
Outcome
Dismissed
Tenantcheck Insights · Case study
Decided 14 December 2025 · Published 14 December 2025 · Application 9055764
Key facts from the published tribunal order.
Outcome
Dismissed
From published order
Location
Auckland
Tribunal region
Dispute themes
What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.
| Claim | Landlord | Tenant | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — |
Claims and awards for application 9055764. Verify on MoJ.
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
This published New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal case (9055764) concerns a property damage dispute at Birkenhead, Auckland. The tribunal decision was published on 14 December 2025. The outcome was dismissed. This is an AI-assisted summary of the official MoJ order — not legal advice.
Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).
s0800, s1, s10009, s126, s127, s138, s138(1), s138(4), s2, s3, s33, s3A, s463, s5, s65, s66, s73368, s84
Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.
The outcome was Dismissed.
Other Claim: $41,379.15 awarded to —; Other Claim: $100,000.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $100,000.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $50,000.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $41.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $21,908.50 awarded to —; Other Claim: $7,236.95 awarded to —; Other Claim: $3,459.20 awarded to —; Other Claim: $8,774.50 awarded to —; Other Claim: $143.71 awarded to —; Other Claim: $15,552.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $21,523.40 awarded to —; Other Claim: $4,789.75 awarded to —; Other Claim: $50,483.18 awarded to —; Other Claim: $109,004.77 awarded to —; Other Claim: $207,913.42 awarded to —; Other Claim: $143.71 awarded to —; Other Claim: $207,913.42 awarded to —; Other Claim: $103,956.71 awarded to —; Other Claim: $56,741.64 awarded to —; Other Claim: $62,433.70 awarded to —; Other Claim: $207,913.42 awarded to —; Other Claim: $10,900,477.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $41,379.15 awarded to —; Other Claim: $1,000.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $1,000.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $200.00 awarded to —
The primary dispute was Property damage. Related themes: Harassment, Unit Titles, Other.
The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12755274-Tribunal_Order.pdf.
From published order
Location
Auckland
Tribunal region
Dispute themes
What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.
| Claim | Landlord | Tenant | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — | ||
| Other | — |
Claims and awards for application 9055764. Verify on MoJ.
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
This published New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal case (9055764) concerns a property damage dispute at Birkenhead, Auckland. The tribunal decision was published on 14 December 2025. The outcome was dismissed. This is an AI-assisted summary of the official MoJ order — not legal advice.
Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).
s0800, s1, s10009, s126, s127, s138, s138(1), s138(4), s2, s3, s33, s3A, s463, s5, s65, s66, s73368, s84
Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.
The outcome was Dismissed.
Other Claim: $41,379.15 awarded to —; Other Claim: $100,000.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $100,000.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $50,000.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $41.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $21,908.50 awarded to —; Other Claim: $7,236.95 awarded to —; Other Claim: $3,459.20 awarded to —; Other Claim: $8,774.50 awarded to —; Other Claim: $143.71 awarded to —; Other Claim: $15,552.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $21,523.40 awarded to —; Other Claim: $4,789.75 awarded to —; Other Claim: $50,483.18 awarded to —; Other Claim: $109,004.77 awarded to —; Other Claim: $207,913.42 awarded to —; Other Claim: $143.71 awarded to —; Other Claim: $207,913.42 awarded to —; Other Claim: $103,956.71 awarded to —; Other Claim: $56,741.64 awarded to —; Other Claim: $62,433.70 awarded to —; Other Claim: $207,913.42 awarded to —; Other Claim: $10,900,477.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $41,379.15 awarded to —; Other Claim: $1,000.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $1,000.00 awarded to —; Other Claim: $200.00 awarded to —
The primary dispute was Property damage. Related themes: Harassment, Unit Titles, Other.
The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/12755274-Tribunal_Order.pdf.
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other
Other