What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5040628?

The tribunal order states: Heta Clark must pay Reliable Rental Management Limited As Agent For

How much money was awarded in case 5040628?

Filing Fee: $27.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $1,800.00 awarded to landlord; Water Rates: $94.33 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5040628?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5040628?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11864930-Tribunal_Order.pdf.

What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5040628?

The tribunal order states: Heta Clark must pay Reliable Rental Management Limited As Agent For

How much money was awarded in case 5040628?

Filing Fee: $27.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $1,800.00 awarded to landlord; Water Rates: $94.33 awarded to landlord

What type of tenancy dispute was case 5040628?

The primary dispute was Rent arrears.

Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5040628?

The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/11864930-Tribunal_Order.pdf.

Unit/Flat Flat 3, 84 Princes Street, Otahuhu, Auckland 1062 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5040628 — Rent arrears

Tenantcheck Insights

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Loading insights…

Pulling tribunal records

Unit/Flat Flat 3, 84 Princes Street, Otahuhu, Auckland 1062 Tenancy Tribunal Case 5040628 — Rent arrears | TenantCheck

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5040628 — net $1,921.33 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears	$1,800.00	Rent arrears
Water rates	$94.33	Water rates
Filing fee reimbursement	$27.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$1,921.33
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$1,921.33

Claims and awards for application 5040628 — net $1,921.33 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Rent arrears

Amount: $1,800.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rent arrears

Water rates

Amount: $94.33
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Water rates

Filing fee reimbursement

Amount: $27.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Filing fee reimbursement

Net award

Landlord $1,921.33

Total payable by Tenant to Landlord

Landlord $1,921.33

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Filing Fee Rent arrears Water Rates

Order

Heta Clark must pay Reliable Rental Management Limited As Agent For Manohar Singh $1,921.33 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing, conducted via teleconference. Two calls to the tenant went unanswered.
This tenancy has been the subject of a prior order in favour of the landlord (TT4711570 dated 15 February 2025). This is currently under enforcement action but I was told it is on hold as the tenant cannot be located. As that previous order is under enforcement, it is not joined to this order and remains active.
This application was previously adjourned for further service. Having heard from the landlord, I consider it now appropriate to dispense with the requirement for service (see s 91B(2)(c) Residential Tenancies Act 1986).
The landlord has applied for rent arrears, and water rates since the previous order.
The landlord also sought compensation but such a claim, if accepted, required further evidence. Provision was made to receive this evidence after the hearing, but it has not been forthcoming. Given this, I have not considered any compensation claim and the landlord is to lodge a further application for any compensation claims, if it so chooses.

How much is owed for rent and water rates?

The tenants extended their stay for four weeks beyond the initial end date of 31 March 2024 as ordered on 15 February 2025. The landlord provided rent summaries of the further rent and water rates due since that order. Filing fee
Because Reliable Rental Management Limited As Agent For Manohar Singh has substantially succeeded with the claim I have reimbursed the filing fee. Suppression
Section 95A RTA states regarding suppression orders that the Tribunal must, on the application of a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in proceedings, order that the party’s name or identifying particulars not be published, unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case.
The landlord requested suppression in its application. However, I decline to order suppression. The prior order noted in this order is public and the claims here are additions to the rent arrears and water rates already ordered in that. It is more appropriate to continue with the naming convention of the first order. I do not consider this denial of suppression disadvantages the landlord. I am also mindful that given the late application and subsequent uncertainty regarding service, the public order with names may allow the tenant alternative access to, or awareness of, the order.

Claims & awards

What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.

Claims and awards in Tenancy Tribunal application 5040628 — net $1,921.33 NZD. Amounts reconciled from the published order (claims sum and net total). Verify on MoJ.
Claim	Landlord	Reason
Rent arrears	$1,800.00	Rent arrears
Water rates	$94.33	Water rates
Filing fee reimbursement	$27.00	Filing fee reimbursement
Net award	$1,921.33
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord	$1,921.33

Claims and awards for application 5040628 — net $1,921.33 NZD. Verify on MoJ.

Rent arrears

Amount: $1,800.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Rent arrears

Water rates

Amount: $94.33
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Water rates

Filing fee reimbursement

Amount: $27.00
Awarded to: Landlord
Reason: Filing fee reimbursement

Net award

Landlord $1,921.33

Total payable by Tenant to Landlord

Landlord $1,921.33

Claim types — money lines allowed on this order

Filing Fee Rent arrears Water Rates

Order

Heta Clark must pay Reliable Rental Management Limited As Agent For Manohar Singh $1,921.33 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

Reasons

The landlord attended the hearing, conducted via teleconference. Two calls to the tenant went unanswered.
This tenancy has been the subject of a prior order in favour of the landlord (TT4711570 dated 15 February 2025). This is currently under enforcement action but I was told it is on hold as the tenant cannot be located. As that previous order is under enforcement, it is not joined to this order and remains active.
This application was previously adjourned for further service. Having heard from the landlord, I consider it now appropriate to dispense with the requirement for service (see s 91B(2)(c) Residential Tenancies Act 1986).
The landlord has applied for rent arrears, and water rates since the previous order.
The landlord also sought compensation but such a claim, if accepted, required further evidence. Provision was made to receive this evidence after the hearing, but it has not been forthcoming. Given this, I have not considered any compensation claim and the landlord is to lodge a further application for any compensation claims, if it so chooses.

How much is owed for rent and water rates?

The tenants extended their stay for four weeks beyond the initial end date of 31 March 2024 as ordered on 15 February 2025. The landlord provided rent summaries of the further rent and water rates due since that order. Filing fee
Because Reliable Rental Management Limited As Agent For Manohar Singh has substantially succeeded with the claim I have reimbursed the filing fee. Suppression
Section 95A RTA states regarding suppression orders that the Tribunal must, on the application of a party that has wholly or substantially succeeded in proceedings, order that the party’s name or identifying particulars not be published, unless the Tribunal considers that publication is in the public interest or is justified because of the party’s conduct or any other circumstances of the case.
The landlord requested suppression in its application. However, I decline to order suppression. The prior order noted in this order is public and the claims here are additions to the rent arrears and water rates already ordered in that. It is more appropriate to continue with the naming convention of the first order. I do not consider this denial of suppression disadvantages the landlord. I am also mindful that given the late application and subsequent uncertainty regarding service, the public order with names may allow the tenant alternative access to, or awareness of, the order.

Tenancy Tribunal case 5040628 — Rent arrears at Unit/Flat Flat 3, 84 Princes Street, Otahuhu, Auckland 1062

At a glance

Tenancy Tribunal case 5040628 — Rent arrears at Unit/Flat Flat 3, 84 Princes Street, Otahuhu, Auckland 1062

At a glance

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

How much is owed for rent and water rates?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions

Award balance

Claims & awards

Order

Reasons

How much is owed for rent and water rates?

Topics & place

Residential Tenancies Act sections

Key findings

Property management

Frequently asked questions