Tenantcheck Insights · Case study
Tenancy Tribunal case 5486376 — Rent arrears at 37 Brookland Road, Western Heights, Rotorua 3015
Published 13 May 2026 · Application 5486376
- Rent arrears
At a glance
Key facts from the published tribunal order.
Outcome
Landlord favoured
From published order
Location
Rotorua
Tribunal region
Adjudicator
D Watson
Dispute themes
Award balance
Gross awards, any bond applied per the order, and the remaining balance payable.
- Gross award
- $5,468.00
- Bond payment as ordered
- −$2,720.00
- Total balance for Tenant to pay Landlord
- $2,748.00
Claims & awards
What this tenancy cost at tribunal — claim, category, amount, and party awarded, with reconciled net total.
| Claim | Landlord | Tenant | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rent arrears to today | $5,440.00 | Rent arrears to today | |
| Filing fee reimbursement | $28.00 | Filing fee reimbursement | |
| Net award | $2,748.00 | ||
| Total payable by Tenant to Landlord | $2,748.00 |
Claims and awards for application 5486376 — net $2,748.00 NZD. Verify on MoJ.
Rent arrears to today
- Amount
- $5,440.00
- Awarded to
- Landlord
- Reason
- Rent arrears to today
Filing fee reimbursement
- Amount
- $28.00
- Awarded to
- Landlord
- Reason
- Filing fee reimbursement
Net award
Landlord $2,748.00
Total payable by Tenant to Landlord
Landlord $2,748.00
Claim types — money lines allowed on this order
Order
- The tenancy of Haley Allatt at 37 Brookland Road, Western Heights, Rotorua 3015 is terminated, and possession is granted to Amtos Realty Services Limited As Agent For Gagandeep Brar, at 5pm today 13 May 2026.
- The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $2,720.00 (5032714007) to Amtos Realty Services Limited As Agent For Gagandeep Brar immediately.
- Haley Allatt must pay Amtos Realty Services Limited As Agent For Gagandeep Brar $2,748.00 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below.
Reasons
- Only the landlord attended the hearing.
- The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.
Should the tenancy be terminated?
- The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
- Where the breach is capable of remedy the landlord must first serve a notice on the tenant requiring them to remedy the breach within at least 14 days and establish that the tenant has failed to do so.
- The tenant has breached their obligations by failing to comply with a 14 day notice to pay rent.
- The tenant did not remedy the breach within the required period.
- It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy.
- The landlord has applied for rent arrears and has provided rent records which prove the amount owing.
- Because Amtos Realty Services Limited As Agent For Gagandeep Brar has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.
Topics & place
Topics are dispute themes across the order (not the same as claim-type money lines).
Residential Tenancies Act sections
s56(1)
Key findings
- Dispute theme: rent arrears
Property management
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about this Tenancy Tribunal case.
What was the outcome of Tenancy Tribunal case 5486376?
The tribunal order states: The tenancy of Haley Allatt at 37 Brookland Road, Western Heights, Rotorua
How much money was awarded in case 5486376?
Filing Fee: $28.00 awarded to landlord; Rent Arrears: $5,440.00 awarded to landlord
What type of tenancy dispute was case 5486376?
The primary dispute was Rent arrears.
Where can I read the official tribunal order for case 5486376?
The official Ministry of Justice published order is available at https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/TTV2/PDF/13591647-Tenancy_Tribunal_Order.pdf.